Removal
India
Biochar
Carbon Standards International
Removal
Puerto Rico
Biochar
Puro
Avoidance
Tanzania
Ecosystem conservation
Plan Vivo
The following SDGs are supported by this portfolio.
40.5%
SDG - 1
No Poverty
0.2%
SDG - 2
Zero Hunger
23.9%
SDG - 3
Good Health and Well-being
13.8%
SDG - 4
Quality Education
14%
SDG - 5
Gender Equality
13.8%
SDG - 6
Clean Water and Sanitation
45.4%
SDG - 7
Affordable and Clean Energy
62.2%
SDG - 8
Decent Work and Economic Growth
0.9%
SDG - 9
Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
0.2%
SDG - 10
Reduced Inequality
0.9%
SDG - 11
Sustainable Cities and Communities
3.9%
SDG - 12
Responsible Consumption and Production
61.3%
SDG - 13
Climate Action
0.2%
SDG - 14
Life Below Water
16.8%
SDG - 15
Life on Land
2.9%
SDG - 17
Partnerships to achieve the Goal
Mitigating climate action is a global challenge, and projects can be found in almost every country. The global South and East dominate nature-based projects, while the North is focused on newer carbon removal technologies.
Top countries in this portfolio:
Indonesia
14,446t
Somalia
12,000t
Tanzania
11,220t
Aruba
6,000t
India
4,580t
Renewable energy
23,500t
Energy efficiency
12,000t
Ecosystem conservation
11,220t
Ecosystem restoration
3,346t
Biochar
575t
CEEZER harmonized the various mitigation strategies into easy to understand categories based on their focus, technology and application area.
7.7%
Carbon removal.
Removal projects focus on drawing down and storing carbon from the atmosphere.
92.3%
Avoided emissions.
These projects focus on avoiding the release of further greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
Retired credits (t)
41,716
Committed credits (t)
25
41,716t CO₂e of carbon credits in this portfolio have already been retired. These credits cannot be traded anymore and are accounted for specific compensation activities. They additionally committed to 25t CO₂e of carbon credits, which will be retired in the future. These commitments are crucial to scale voluntary climate action, as they provide revenue security to project developers.
Credit commitments:
In addition to carbon credits, Zooplus SE also contributed to other climate action that can be accounted for in tons of CO₂e.
Commercial contributions (t)
8,900
The Oxford Categories help build effective and net zero aligned carbon portfolios, by balancing the different permanencies of mitigation activities, to increase the share of longer permanence.
70.1%
Oxford Cat. 1
Avoided emission or reduction without storage.
22.2%
Oxford Cat. 2
Emission reduction with short-lived storage.
0%
Oxford Cat. 3
Emission reduction with long-lived storage.
6.6%
Oxford Cat. 4
Carbon removal with short-lived storage.
1.1%
Oxford Cat. 5
Carbon removal with long-lived storage.
0%
Not applicable
Projects outside of the Oxford Categories.
Registries are independent international bodies that govern the voluntary carbon market through their certification standards and carbon credit issuance.
Forest Adaptation Project in Schlegel, Germany
Project developerPina Technologies GmbH
Gula Gula Food Forest Program
Project developerCO2 Operate BV
Oregon Biochar Solutions
Project developerOregon Biochar Solutions
Biochar - Indian Carboneers
Project developerCarboneers United B.V.
BioRestorative Idea - Puerto Rico
Project developerGECA Environnement (GECA Design Inc)
GS10789 VPA1: Efficient and Clean Cooking for households in Somalia
Project developerECOA Climate Capital
YAEDA-EYASI LANDSCAPE REDD PROJECT
Project developerCarbon Tanzania
Musi River Hydro
Project developerPT. PLN (Persero)
Wind Park Vader Piet Aruba
Project developerWEB Aruba N.V.
50 MW Sipansihaporas Hydro Power Plant, North Sumatra
Project developerSouth Pole Deutschland GmbH
34 MW Wind Power Project at Khanapur, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
Project developerOrange Maha Wind Energy Private Limited
Retired carbon credits shown in this climate portfolio are verified. Portfolios might contain: (a) future credits (commitments), that will be verified once the retirement becomes available; (b) credits that were not purchased through the CEEZER marketplace, and therefore did not undergo our quality screening; (c) credits that originate from registries that we do not support.